Measure W: Balancing Control, Independence, and Practical Challenges

Siskiyou County voters are facing a crucial decision with Measure W, which proposes changing the County Auditor-Controller position from elected to appointed. This measure has sparked a debate that touches on complex issues of governance, independence, and practical realities. The discussion gained momentum after the county enacted Measure 22-07 in March 2022, an urgency ordinance that simplified the qualifications for the Auditor-Controller role by removing specific educational or professional experience requirements.

Proponents of Measure W argue that it would ensure proper financial oversight by mandating an annual independent audit of the Auditor-Controller’s office. However, it’s important to note that such audits are already required for all counties receiving federal funds, as mandated by the Single Audit Act of 1984 and the Office of Management and Budget Uniform Guidance. These audits, which cover all federal funds and include a review of internal controls and compliance with federal program requirements, will continue regardless of whether the position is elected or appointed.

Critics of Measure W raise concerns about the potential impact on the independence of the Auditor-Controller. They argue that an elected official, answerable directly to the voters, may feel more empowered to stand firm on financial issues without fear of losing their job. There are worries that an appointed Auditor-Controller might feel pressure to please the Board of Supervisors to maintain their position, potentially compromising their ability to provide unbiased financial oversight.

The debate also touches on broader questions of government control. Some voters express a preference for less government control, arguing that keeping the position elected maintains a direct line of accountability to the voters. They suggest that an elected Auditor-Controller serves as a check on the power of other county officials, maintaining a balance that could be upset by moving to an appointed position.

However, the county faces practical challenges in attracting candidates for this specialized role. The limited pool of local experts with the necessary qualifications, combined with the challenges of running for office, may deter qualified individuals from seeking the position. This difficulty in finding candidates has likely contributed to the proposal of Measure W.

As Siskiyou County residents prepare to vote, they must weigh several factors: the value of direct electoral control, the importance of potentially expanding the pool of qualified candidates, concerns about concentrating power in the hands of the Board of Supervisors, and the practical need to ensure the position is filled by a capable individual. The situation illustrates the tension between democratic ideals and practical governance, with no easy answers in sight.

Ultimately, voters will need to consider their priorities for county governance and make a choice based on what they believe will best serve the county’s needs in both the short and long term. As one local resident aptly put it, “It’s a sticky situation.” Siskiyou County residents are encouraged to research further and carefully consider these factors before casting their votes on this significant change to county governance.