The dichotomy between blue and red states – in essence California vs. Florida and Texas – has played out in many arenas on many specific issues, including immigration and abortion.
The whole nation will get a full dose of the running conflict next month when California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who’s obsessed with building a national image, debates Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a declared 2024 Republican candidate for president, on national television.
Meanwhile, an ironic twist to the rivalry has developed over how the competing states seek to force social media companies, such as X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook, to toe the official line on content that runs afoul of their very different ideological outlooks.
When it reconvened this month, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to examine laws in Florida and Texas that would prohibit social media outlets from barring controversial political speech. The laws were enacted after both Facebook and Twitter suspended former President Donald Trump’s account.
The Texas law, now on hold, would classify social media companies as common carriers such as public utilities and require them to disclose their “moderation standards” affecting what they allow to be posted, and declare why they remove certain conduct.
The Florida law – similar in thrust – would prohibit banning certain users, such as journalists or politicians, and require social media companies to explain the rationale for each instance of content moderation.
In both cases, the social media companies say Florida and Texas are attempting to control how they edit their platforms in violation of the Constitution’s right to freedom of speech.
Learn more about legislators mentioned in this story
Jesse Gabriel
State Assembly, District 46 (Woodland Hills)
“At bottom, government ‘may not … tell Twitter or YouTube what videos to post; or tell Facebook or Google what content to favor,’” Scott Keller, an attorney for internet trade groups, told the court in a petition.
The issues before the Supreme Court are remarkably similar to a lawsuit filed in federal court this month by X Corp. against California, alleging that a 2022 law violates its free speech right as well.
The law, Assembly Bill 587, also bores into the standards that social media use to moderate content, requiring them to make extensive disclosures to the state Department of Justice. The measure was sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League and is aimed at pressuring the social media companies to remove what the sponsor deems to be hate speech.
“The line between providing an open forum for productive discourse and permitting the proliferation of hate speech and misinformation is a fine one, and depends largely on the structure and practices of the platform,” Assemblyman Jesse Gabriel, a Woodland Hills Democrat, said in a statement as his bill was being considered.
X Corp. claims that Gabriel’s law violates the First Amendment because it interferes with social media companies’ constitutionally protected editorial judgements, requires them to post terms “dictated by the government,” and pressures them to remove content the state “deems undesirable or harmful.”
Fundamentally, then, while Texas and Florida accuse social media of being too eager to censor inflammatory content, the California law implies that they are not eager enough.
California, meanwhile, has rolled back another censorship law passed last year.
Assembly Bill 2098 threatened doctors with losing their licenses for “unprofessional conduct” if they openly disagreed with officialdom on the nature of COVID-19 or the vaccines used to battle the pandemic.
This year, a few words that repealed the law were slipped into an omnibus medical licensing measure, Senate Bill 815, that Newsom quietly signed. The repeal short-circuited what could have been another legal battle over censorship and the First Amendment and is a lesson about legislating without considering effects on constitutional rights.
- Baby Horse Rescue On The Open RangeThe all-volunteer team at Wild Horse Fire Brigade works hard every day overseeing our local herd of cultural-heritage horses here on the Open Range in the mountains on the California-Oregon border. The ancestors of these horses were documented extensively, and photographed by the famous Henley-Hornbrook area ‘buckaroo’, George F. Wright. George lived in a cabin on the… Read more: Baby Horse Rescue On The Open Range
- Governor Newsom’s Legislative Push: Reshaping California’s Policy LandscapeGovernor Gavin Newsom is actively pushing to expand California’s legislative reach across multiple policy areas, with a particular focus on energy and gas prices. He has called for a special session to address energy affordability, proposing new requirements for oil refineries to maintain stable inventory levels. This move aligns with his ongoing efforts to combat… Read more: Governor Newsom’s Legislative Push: Reshaping California’s Policy Landscape
- Documentary Film HORSE of NATURE ‘Officially Selected’ by prestigious EQUUS Film & Arts FestivalFilmed in the mountains of Siskiyou County California, HORSE of NATURE showcases the unique relationship between people, wild horses and wildfire YREKA, CA, UNITED STATES, September 7, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ — *Based on a true story and actual events, ‘HORSE of NATURE’ is set in the middle of the remote Cascade Siskiyou Mountains near the Oregon-California… Read more: Documentary Film HORSE of NATURE ‘Officially Selected’ by prestigious EQUUS Film & Arts Festival
- California Insider: Siskiyou Sheriff Explains How Toxic Pesticides in California’s Legal WeedSiyamak Khorrami September 7, 2024 “We’re now talking about contaminated marijuana that is out in the legal market. We had 15 pesticides on the marijuana product that the state isn’t even looking for. Five of them are 100% banned in the United States, and they’re not allowed to be used at all. Some of these… Read more: California Insider: Siskiyou Sheriff Explains How Toxic Pesticides in California’s Legal Weed
- McCloud Market: Where Community and Commerce ThriveSince 1971, the McCloud Market has been a cornerstone of the McCloud community. The DeBon family took ownership after the McCloud Lumber Mill sold, with Reno and Amber DeBon stepping into leadership roles in 2011. Today, with a staff of 15, the market does more than keep the people of McCloud fed – it nurtures… Read more: McCloud Market: Where Community and Commerce Thrive