Judge: Federal Shasta River “Safe Harbor” coho salmon program violates Endangered Species Act
Press Release
July 12, 2023

Shasta Coho Victory PR
Late yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled against a federal “Safe Harbor” program on California’s Shasta River that allowed a dam owner and water diverters to harm threatened coho salmon in exchange for scant “stewardship” practices on private lands. The court halted the program, invalidating the underlying biological opinion and environmental assessment. Now, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) must prepare a new biological opinion and a more thorough environmental impact statement that do not violate the Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act, respectively.
The Shasta River was once the most important salmon-producing tributary of the Klamath River, but now fewer than 50 coho salmon are returning to the Shasta each year. The recovery target for coho salmon returning annually is in the thousands. In recent years, irrigators have virtually dewatered the river on several occasions.

“This decision is a victory for common sense, coho salmon in the Shasta River, and for our clients who have suffered immeasurable loss from salmon declines here,” said Sangye Ince-Johannsen, attorney at the Western Environmental Law Center. “The National Marine Fisheries Service rubber-stamped the very same practices that have so deteriorated conditions in the Shasta, overwhelmingly favoring irrigation at the expense of threatened coho salmon. These 20-year, transferable permits were poised to hasten the decline of returning coho in the Shasta, possibly to zero.”

NMFS’ Shasta River safe harbor agreements were purportedly intended to address the historic decline in coho salmon in the Shasta. While these agreements with 14 permittees were intended to provide a “net conservation benefit,” they let landowners off the hook for all the damage they cause to coho. The cumulative benefit of all 14 agreements, even if all are successfully implemented, would have fallen far short of halting the spiraling decline, much less aided their recovery.
“The Shasta River was once the most important tributary to the Klamath River; today, Shasta River coho salmon are nearly extinct. The court’s decision forces a reconsideration of what is necessary to not only forestall that extinction but to bring back the Shasta to a sustainable fishery,” said Tom Wheeler, executive director of Environmental Protection Information Center. “Salmon extinction is unacceptable, both for the human communities that have relied on salmon—particularly the tribal communities along the Klamath River—and for the non-human community, for which salmon are a cornerstone of healthy ecosystems.

“We have won a restructuring of how much-needed federal and state assistance for restoring the Shasta River is implemented,” said Bill Chesney, retired California Department of Fish and Wildlife fisheries biologist and Friends of the Shasta River board member. “Agencies first need to recommend and implement science-based flow and temperature standards sufficient to recover coho in the Shasta River. That needs to come first—not just as an afterthought once the safe harbor participants get immunity for their destructive practices.”
“We are concerned that NMFS has taken a turn down the wrong path in the way it is using Safe Harbor,” said Nick Joslin, a fifth-generation river user with Friends of the Shasta River. “It is saying even the most minimal improvements in habitat are grounds for giving irrigators 20 years of leeway to ignore activities that will effectively extirpate coho in the Shasta River, in exchange for doing little more than sucking up millions of dollars in public funds for ranch improvements they should be doing themselves. It’s crazy for NMFS to roll over and create a program to subsidize the destruction of our river.”
Irrigators paid $1,600 per year to participate in the safe harbor program, demanding to receive millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded infrastructure work on their properties as well as immunity from the law for harming threatened coho salmon. Billionaire Red Emmerson, whose Sierra Pacific Industries is the largest private landowner in the U.S., is among the participants.
When the last tree is cut down, the last fish eaten and the last stream poisoned, you will realize that you cannot eat money.
-Cree Tribe Proverb

In her order, Judge Thompson astutely concluded: “Lest we fail to heed the warning of the Cree Tribe, Tenayah Norris and members of the Yurok Tribe will raise their families with only stories to share about the coho salmon, a species that has been a staple of their culture for centuries.” [order at 27]
- SUMMONS: Court Case Number: CVPT24-01610 (CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA- COUNTY OF YUBASUMMONS(CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER)SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF YUBA Person asking for protection: MARIE VUE Notice to Person to be Restrained: MAI M. VANG. This person MARIE VUE is asking for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order against you. You have a court date on June 2, 2025, 9:30am in Dept. 4. If you do not… Read more: SUMMONS: Court Case Number: CVPT24-01610 (CIVIL HARASSMENT RESTRAINING ORDER) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA- COUNTY OF YUBA
- FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT: 2025-47-0101Filing No.: 2025-47-0101FILED IN: Siskiyou CountyDATE: 04-11-2025 Laura Bynum, Clerk By: Laura Bynum, Deputy ClerkFICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENTThe following person (persons) is (are) doing business as:R&B Enterprises508A Oberlin RdYreka Ca 96097 in SiskiyouRegistered Owner(s):Richard Horn1404 Placer DrYreka Ca 96097This Business is conducted by: An IndividualThe registrant commenced to transact business under the fictitious business name… Read more: FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT: 2025-47-0101
- FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT: 2025-47-0113Filing No.: 2025-47-0113FILED IN: Siskiyou CountyDATE: 04/22/2025Laura Bynum, Clerk By: Laura Bynum,Deputy Clerk FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT The following person (persons) is (are) doing business as:John McGuire Tree Service839 Schilling wayMount Shasta, CA 96067 in SiskiyouRegistered Owner(s):John McGuire839 Schilling WayMount Shasta, CA 96067 This Business is conducted by: An Individual The registrant commenced to transact… Read more: FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT: 2025-47-0113
- Free Kids Day Festival 2025 Supports Siskiyou County CommunitiesWhat is better than a Kids Day Festival with games, craft, food, and activities that is completely free for the whole family? There are so many resources offered in Siskiyou County. The Family & Community Resource Center of Weed has collaborated with Siskiyou Community Resources Collaborative, and all the other organizations to familiarize people in… Read more: Free Kids Day Festival 2025 Supports Siskiyou County Communities
- All Poultry and Dairy Cattle Exhibits Banned from 2025 Siskiyou Golden FairApril 25, 2025 YREKA- The 2025 Siskiyou Golden Fair, the 100th at the fairground on Fairlane Road in Yreka, will be without the poultry and dairy cattle departments. In January 2025 the California State Veterinarian issued a statewide ban (until further notice) on all poultry and dairy cattle at fairs and shows due to the… Read more: All Poultry and Dairy Cattle Exhibits Banned from 2025 Siskiyou Golden Fair
This is one awesome blog.Really thank you! Really Cool.
Very informative article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.