Home / Uncategorized / OPINION: California regulators want to spend billions to reduce a fraction of water usage

OPINION: California regulators want to spend billions to reduce a fraction of water usage

BYย DAN WALTERS
CalMatters JANUARY 26, 2024

Household use is a tiny fraction of Californiaโ€™s overall water supply, but the state wants to spend billions of dollars to make a tiny reduction in that already infinitesimal bit of water consumption. Image byย zukunftssichererย fromย Pixabay

Hydrologists measure large amounts of water in acre-feet โ€“ an acre of water one-foot deep, or 326,000 gallons.

In an average year, 200 million acre-feet of water fall on California as rain or snow. The vast majority of it sinks into the ground or evaporates, but about a third of it finds its way into rivers. Half of that will eventually flow into the Pacific Ocean.

That leaves approximately 35-40 million acre-feet for human use, with three-quarters being applied to fields and orchards to support the stateโ€™s agricultural output, and the remaining quarter โ€“ 9-10 million acre-feet โ€“ being used for household, commercial and industrial purposes.

In other words, nearly 39 million Californians wind up using about 5% of the original precipitation to water their lawns, bathe themselves, operate toilets and cook their food.

That number is important because it is such a tiny amount, even though the stateโ€™s perennial household water conservation programs imply that taking fewer showers or reducing lawn watering will somehow solve the stateโ€™s water problems.

The ludicrous nature of those propagandistic appeals is quite evident in the state Water Resources Control Boardโ€™s new plan to force local water agencies into cutting household water use even more, no matter the multibillion-dollar cost, and with penalties if they fail to meet quotas.

The water board says the plan, which was authorized by the Legislature in 2018, would reduce household use by 440,000 acre-feet a year when fully implemented. That would be about 5% of current use, which is only about 5% of average precipitation โ€“ scarcely a drop in the bucket.

The plan is drawing some well-reasoned criticism from two independent observers, the Legislative Analyst Office, an arm of the Legislature, and the Public Policy Institute of California, the stateโ€™s premier think tank.

The LAO, in a report to the Legislature, said the plan โ€œwill create challenges for water suppliers in several key ways, in many cases without compelling justifications.โ€

In essence, the LAO said, local water agencies would have to jump through the stateโ€™s hoops by spending billions of dollars for a tiny reduction in overall water use that could have an adverse impact on low-income families.

The PPIC is similarly skeptical, summarizing the plan as โ€œvery high cost for little benefit.โ€ PPIC fellows David Mitchell and Ellen Hanak also pointed out its effects on low-income communities and the difficulty it would impose on local governmentsโ€™ programs to plant and maintain trees as a shield against hot summer weather.

California does indeed have a water supply problem, mostly because its political leaders for decades have failed to expand the stateโ€™s water infrastructure that had been built during the mid-20th century.

Household use is not the problem. It cannot be because it is such a tiny part of the overall water picture and actually has declined, in relative terms, as the stateโ€™s population reached 40 million, more than twice what it was when the last major water works were constructed.

The major mismatch of demand and supply occurs in the two largest categories of water use, agriculture and the environment. Agricultural water agencies and environmental groups have been jousting for decades in the Legislature, in Congress, in courts and in regulatory agencies such as the water board over how much water farmers can draw and how much should remain in rivers to protect habitat for fish and other wildlife.

Thatโ€™s the issue that must be resolved by reallocating existing supplies, building new storage and/or creating new supplies, such as desalination of seawater. Spending billions of dollars to save a few gallons of household water is just an expensive exercise in virtue-signaling that accomplishes virtually nothing.


  • FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT: Carson’s Window Coverings & More
    Post Views: 4 Filing No.: 2026-47-0190FILED IN: Siskiyou CountyDATE: 06-03-2026Laura Bynam, ClerkBy: D.Brooks,Deputy ClerkFICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENTThe following person (persons) is (are) doing business as:Carson’s Window Coverings & More108 S. BroadwayYreka, CA 96097 in SiskiyouMailing Address:108 S. BroadwayYreka, CA 96097530 598-9247Registered Owner(s):Maridee CarsonThis Business is conducted by: An IndividualThe registrant commenced to transact business under
  • Traffic Stop in Siskiyou County Leads to $1.9 Million Cocaine Seizure, Driver Arrested
    Post Views: 5 Source – Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Office -$1.9 Million Cocaine Seizure Results in Arrest- On May 29, 2026 at approximately 1150 hours, a Siskiyou County Deputy conducted a traffic stop on a 2022 Mazda CX5 for a mechanical violation. During the traffic stop, the driver was found to be unlicensed and demonstrating multiple
  • F-35A Lightning II Jets from Luke AFB Arrive for Two-Week Training at Kingsley Field
    Post Views: 5 Siskiyou County, California โ€” Residents in Siskiyou County and surrounding areas may notice increased jet activity and noise in the skies over Shasta Valley and nearby regions as a squadron of advanced F-35A Lightning II fighters from Luke Air Force Base, Arizona, trains with the Oregon Air National Guardโ€™s 173rd Fighter Wing.
  • Mountain Lion F29 to Be Relocated Again โ€” Residents Question Whether It Will Stick
    Post Views: 10 Mountain Lion F29 Under Active Capture Operation Near Mount Shasta MOUNT SHASTA, CA โ€” The Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Office and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife announced Tuesday that F29, the juvenile female mountain lion that has been preying on pets and small livestock in the Weed and Mount Shasta areas,
  • Fake Virus Alerts, Phishing, and Online Scams: How to Protect Yourself From Today’s Most Common Digital Threats
    Post Views: 51 A Message from Digital Expert My name is Sohaib Ur Rehman, and I work with Siskiyou News in digital publishing and online media. Over the years, I have seen countless examples of misleading online advertisements, phishing attempts, fake virus warnings, and other internet scams designed to trick users into sharing personal information

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *