“This is the secret system that covers up police misconduct โ and ensures problem officers can get hired again”
Weed Police Department was unaware of officer’s history due to secret “clean-record agreement”
The Weed Police Department in Siskiyou County hired a police officer whose serious misconduct allegations had been concealed through a secret legal agreement with Los Angeles County, according to a new investigation into California’s hidden police accountability system.
Hossep “Joe” Ourjanian landed the job at Weed Police after securing a “clean-record agreement” that erased evidence of sustained misconduct findings from his personnel file, including allegations that he falsified work records and committed domestic violence while holding their infant son, according to documents obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle and UC Berkeley’s Investigative Reporting Program.
The case illustrates how secret settlements between police agencies and departing officers have enabled problem officers to move between departments across California, with rural counties like Siskiyou often unaware of hiring officers with hidden disciplinary histories.
From Los Angeles to Northern California
Twenty-five years ago, Los Angeles County was preparing to fire Ourjanian for what supervisors called “flagrant” misconduct. Instead, the county agreed to a deal that removed all evidence of wrongdoing from his file and required officials to say only that he had resigned for “personal reasons” if contacted by future employers.
After ensuring the misconduct records were properly sealed through legal action, Ourjanian was able to secure employment 600 miles north at the Weed Police Department in Siskiyou County, the investigation found.
Pattern of Movement Continues
Ourjanian’s time in Siskiyou County was part of a pattern of moving between rural Northern California law enforcement agencies. The investigation shows he later worked for Sierra County Sheriff’s Office near Lake Tahoe, where he was again accused of misconductโthis time embezzlementโand secured another clean-record agreement in 2019.
Eric Apperson, who later hired Ourjanian as Del Norte County Sheriff, said he was shocked to learn about the officer’s hidden disciplinary history when contacted by reporters.
“Are you kidding me?” Apperson said. “If you’re asking me if an officer got terminated for embezzlement, would that make a difference to me if I was hiring them? Yeah, of course, that would make a difference.”
Statewide Problem Affects Rural Counties
The investigation found that at least 163 California police agencies have used these secret agreements to conceal misconduct by 297 officers and deputies. Rural counties are particularly vulnerable because they often have fewer resources for comprehensive background investigations and may be unaware that previous employers are legally prohibited from disclosing relevant information.
“It happens in almost every agency, at every level,” said Sid Smith, a former California police chief and expert on law enforcement background investigations.
Current Status
Ourjanian most recently worked for Del Norte County Sheriff’s Office, where he rose to the rank of captain before suddenly retiring in fall 2023. Sheriff Garrett Scott said the department was investigating whether Ourjanian had lied during his background investigation, including by omitting past misconduct findings.
Scott said he plans to forward the investigation results to state regulators for possible license revocation and to the district attorney for potential criminal charges.
Ourjanian currently works as a police officer for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs in Reno, though the VA suspended him from police duties after learning of “previously sealed information about allegations of wrongdoing,” according to a spokesperson.
Reform Challenges
The practice of clean-record agreements continues despite recent state legislation aimed at increasing police accountability. California has not passed laws similar to those in Alaska, Colorado, and Kansas that restrict or ban such settlements.
The Weed Police Department could not immediately be reached for comment about Ourjanian’s employment history.
The investigation represents the first comprehensive examination of how secret police settlements have operated across California, with particular impact on smaller departments that rely on hiring officers from larger agencies without full knowledge of their disciplinary histories.
This article is based on records and interviews from an investigation by the San Francisco Chronicle and UC Berkeley’s Investigative Reporting Program.
- Mountain Lion F29 to Be Relocated Again โ Residents Question Whether It Will Stick
- Fake Virus Alerts, Phishing, and Online Scams: How to Protect Yourself From Today’s Most Common Digital Threats
- Election Summary Report #2 – June 02,2026 General Election Siskiyou County CA
- Sisq Writersโ Club: Poem โ โWorking Manโ
- Sisq Writersโ Club: Poem โ โBlind Musicianโ





One Comment
I’ve known Joe for exactly 41 years. I know him as well as I know my own blood brother. I worked as a police officer right next to Joe and I call bull**it on the SF Chronicle’s hitpiece implicating Joe Ourjanian as a problem officer, or worse, a bad cop.
Why did SF Chronicle entitle the article “This is the secret system that covers up police misconduct โ and ensures problem officers can get hired again” and then talk only about Joe? Why did this SF Chronicle hitpiece target Joe, yet fail to identify even 1 of the other “297 officers and deputies” supposedly swept up in this dragnet of police corruption.
The accusation that Joe was somehow “bad”, or not fit for duty because of his “past”, is false. There is no “past”. Anyone that has ever met Joe knows, there’s no way he is/was a bad cop. Joe is one of the best police officers a municipality can ever hope to hire. The allegations against Joe are all false, I would stake my life on it.
The “investigation” done by SF Chronicle begins it’s hitpiece by nudging, or setting up the reader to believe that Joe is guilty of something, by regurgitating prior cases against Joe where he was found to be innocent. Even the clean-record agreement from the County of Los Angeles made accusations that were NEVER proven.
If there was one police officer I would feel comfortable leaving to protect my parents in the evening hours of some dingy little, dusty, go-nowhere, has-been, one-horse little town, like Weed, it would be Joe. Weed was blessed to have him and was cursed when he left for a better job.
Maybe what we should be talking about here is how Martin Nicholas, the Weed police chief at the time, extended law enforcement FAVORS to local business owners that would later become donors for a new police facility that was being talked about at the time. I wonder if Siskiyou News would be interested in reporting on that? Like that one? I have many others! Maybe I’ll find a journalist and we can smoke out ALL of the corrupt officials in Weed!! That’d be fun too!!
I was on patrol with Joe in Weed one evening when we noticed a stranded motorist at the Chevron gas station in the dead of winter. Joe was driving and decided to stop and help. I stood by and watched as Joe laid on the filthy ice and snow and changed the right front tire for her and her 4 children. She was so grateful and offered to give Joe money. Joe declined.
I have in my possession, right here and now, a letter from a Weed church that praised the actions of Joe for investigating and bringing to justice, a crazy man, that broke into the church and vandalized the entire interior with spray paint and a hammer. Does that sound like a problem officer to you?
What the public doesn’t understand is that police department is VERY political. If you piss off the wrong moron, you can find yourself in a bunch of made up trouble that’s pinned on you, and there’s not a goddamned thing you can do about it. That’s exactly what’s happened here! Joe pissed off the wrong person and they came for him. They canceled him.
And to this horrible rag, Siskiyou News, shame on you for just regurgitating a bogus investigation by the San Francisco Chronicle without doing your own damn investigation! The author, Jay Martin, lacks journalistic integrity in my opinion because he never contacted or even attempted to contact Joe to get his side of these accusations. Maybe Jay gets paid by the word.